User talk:Michielverbeek

• Oud overleg staat op:
  • Archief van 2007 en 2008
  • Archief van 2009
  • Archief van 2010
  • Archief van 2011
  • Archief van 2012
  • Archief van 2013
  • Archief van 2014
  • Archief van 2015
  • Archief van 2016 January - June
  • Archief van 2016 July - December
  • Archief van 2017 January - June
  • Archief van 2017 July - December
  • Archief van 2018 January - June
  • Archief van 2018 July - December
  • Archief van 2019 January - June
  • Archief van 2019 July - December
  • Archief van 2020 January - June
  • Archief van 2020 July -December
  • Archief van 2021
  • Archief van 2022
  • Archief van 2023
  • Archief van 2024

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle-Wemeldinge, de Aeolus RM23489 IMG 3627 2024-07-14 13.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --TorinoDoc 09:50, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle-Wemeldinge, molen de Hoop RM23514 IMG 3659 2024-07-14 13.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reimerswaal-Kruiningen, station Kruiningen-Yerseke IMG 3685 2024-07-14 15.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:53, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reimerswaal-Rilland, gebouw aan de Hoofdweg IMG 3715 2024-07-14 16.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roosendaal-Wouw, molen de Arend RM39624 IMG 3728 2024-07-14 19.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 15:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roosendaal-Wouw, de Sint-Lambertuskerk RM39627 IMG 3746 2024-07-14 19.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 15:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemert-Bakel - De Mortel, de Sint-Antonius Abtkerk IMG 4404 2024-08-11 11.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Reda Kerbouche 15:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laarbeek-Lieshout, molen De Leest RM25888 IMG 4416 2024-08-11 12.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tilburg, Stadscafé De Spaarbank RM521192 IMG 5947 2024-11-03 10.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Den Haag-Scheveningen, het Kunstmuseum (zuidelijke deel) IMG 6100 2024-11-04 14.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:23, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delft-Abstwoude, brugje bij de Hoofdboschtunnel vanaf het Vackestaertpad IMG 4481 2024-08-18 13.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:27, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venray-Merselo, de Sint-Johannes de Doperkerk RM37221 IMG 4391 2024-08-11 09.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 06:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, station Maastricht IMG 4542 2024-08-22 18.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:51, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oirschot, de Sint-Petruskerk RM31282 IMG 4453 2024-08-11 14.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, stadhuis RM27382 IMG 4563 2024-08-22 18.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, Pater Vincktoren RM28011 IMG 4572 2024-08-22 19.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle-Wemeldinge, de Aeolus RM23489 IMG 3637 2024-07-14 13.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:34, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kapelle, de Hervormde kerk RM23482 IMG 3622 2024-07-14 12.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments too dark, could you lift up the shadows? --Tuxyso 11:37, 29 December 2024 (UTC) I Done the non-sky-area a bit brighter and reduced shadows --Michielverbeek 20:32, 29 December 2024 (UTC) I have reduced  Done the shadows much more and made the sky a bit more blue --Michielverbeek 21:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 11:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, het Dinghuis RM27223 IMG 4551 2024-08-22 18.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Kallerna 09:29, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2025 Deutschland

Hallo Michielverbeek,

Sieger 2024 – Verladeturm Oderhafen

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2025 findet zum 15. Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat GPSLeo mit dem Verladeturm Oderhafen Groß Neuendorf während eines Hochwassers gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2024 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel in Greiz in Thüringen oder in Königslutter am Elm in Niedersachsen. Nachdem es in Thüringen über lange Zeit nicht überall Kulturdenkmallisten gab, ist dieses Bundesland jetzt fast vollständig abgedeckt und die Listen freuen sich über Fotos. Hier findest du einen Einstieg in die Thüringer Listen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Bilder zum Thema „Bauernhöfe und Bauernhäuser“ ausgelobt.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 

Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2025 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang November tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2025 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 19:05, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mertert-Wasserbillig, Rathaus IMG 46112024-08-24 12.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but the shadows could be slightly brighter. --Syntaxys 07:26, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mertert-Wasserbillig, Wasserbilliger Kirche IMG 4619 2024-08-24 12.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mertert-Wasserbillig, Wasserbilliger Kirche IMG 46402024-08-24 12.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:28, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, zicht op de noordkant van de Moezel compositie1 IMG 4692 2024-08-25 09.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, zicht op de noordkant van de Moezel compositie2 IMG 4695 2024-08-25 09.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, toren van Kirche Sankt Gangolf Dm IMG 4717 2024-08-25 10.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trier, de Sankt Der Georgsbrunnen Dm IMG 4737 2024-08-25 10.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kenn, Pfarrkirche Sankt Margaretha Dm IMG 4755 2024-08-25 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldrach, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Laurentius Dm IMG 4764 2024-08-25 13.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:15, 7 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 08:22, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thalfang, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Matthäus Dm IMG 4778 2024-08-26 12.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 08:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morbach, sculptuur in de Birkenfelder Strasse IMG 4796 2024-08-26 14.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traben-Trarbach Kautenbach, Katholische Filialkirche Sankt Maria Himmelfahrt Dm IMG 4857 2024-08-27 10.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:39, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kröv, straatzicht met kerktoren IMG 4894 2024-08-27 13.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Kinheim en Kröv, wijnbouw IMG 4900 2024-08-27 13.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Ürzig en Kinheim, landschap aan de Moezel IMG 4908 2024-08-27 14.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wittlich-Neuerburg, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Nikolaus Dm IMG 4919 2024-08-27 16.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 10 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 16:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morbach, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Anna Dm IMG 4810 2024-08-26 18.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction needed, tower is a bit tilted. --Gower 16:23, 8 October 2025 (UTC) Thanks  Done perspective correction --Michielverbeek 06:51, 10 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:10, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morbach-Gonzerath, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Antonius und Sankt Valerius Dm IMG 4818 2024-08-27 09.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traben-Trarbach, het Rathaus Dm IMG 4860 2024-08-27 11.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plein, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Jakobus Dm IMG 4928 2024-08-28 10.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:38, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plein, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Jakobus Dm MG 4931 2024-08-28 10.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hasborn, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Rochus Dm IMG 4938 2024-08-28 11.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laufeld, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Willibrord Dm IMG 4943 2024-08-28 12.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niederanven-Senningen, Kirche Mariä Himmelfahrt IMG 4600 2024-08-24 10.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tower is a bit tilted --Gower 14:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC) Perspective correction  Done --Michielverbeek 17:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Gower 20:17, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dockweiler, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Laurentius Dm IMG 4977 2024-08-29 10.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenfels, katholische Kirche Sankt Silvester Dm IMG 4986 2024-08-29 10.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 05:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rockeskyll, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Bartholomäus Dm IMG 5005 2024-08-29 11.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:51, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traben Trarbach, de Brückentor Dm IMG 4875 2024-08-27 12.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traben-Trarbach, het Spitzhaus Dm met kerk toren IMG 4888 2024-08-27 13.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bij Pelm, Burg Kasselburg Dm IMG 5017 2024-08-29 11.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:47, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bij Pelm, Burg Kasselburg Dm IMG 5026 2024-08-29 11.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerolstein, Denkmalzone Burg Lissingen Dm IMG 5045 2024-08-29 13.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerolstein-Müllenborn, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Antonius Dm IMG 5050 2024-08-29 14.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:47, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerolstein-Oos, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Rochus Dm IMG 5060 2024-08-29 14.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prüm-Schwirzheim, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Margarethe Dm IMG 5083 2024-08-29 15.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prüm-Weinsheim-Gondelsheim, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Fides IMG 5101 2024-08-29 15.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 05:50, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prüm-Weinsheim, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Willibrord Dm IMG 5113 2024-08-29 16.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daun, de evanglische Kirche Dm IMG 4968 2024-08-28 16.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but tilted --Gower 05:45, 12 October 2025 (UTC) Thanks, I  Done a small perspective correction, the verticals are straight now --Michielverbeek 07:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gerolstein-Bewingen, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Brictius Dm IMG 5129 2024-08-31 11.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kerpen, toren van Burg Kerpen Dm IMG 5156 2024-08-31 13.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 06:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Üxheim-Niederehe, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Leodegar Dm IMG 5163 2024-08-31 13.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:47, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Üxheim-Niederehe, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Leodegar Dm IMG 5168 2024-08-31 13.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenheim, Burg Blankenheim vanaf Rathausplatz IMG 5183 2024-08-31 18.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 07:14, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kall-Sötenich, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Matthias Dm130 IMG 5240 2024-09-01 11.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kall, toren van de katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Nikolaus Dm53 IMG 5263 2024-09-01 12.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Simmerath-Kesternich, de katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Dm17 IMG 5286 2024-09-01 15.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:40, 20 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 15:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenheim, Schloss Blankenheim Dm41 Dm175 met de Ahr op de voorgrond IMG 5176 2024-08-31 15.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side leaning in --Poco a poco 07:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)  Done Perspective correction --Michielverbeek 19:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hillesheim-Bolsdorf, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Margaretha Dm IMG 5141 2024-08-31 11.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:35, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prüm-Büdesheim, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Dm IMG 5074 2024-08-29 14.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Titled. Perspective correction needed. --E bailey 03:48, 19 October 2025 (UTC)  Done Perspective correction --Michielverbeek 08:01, 20 October 2025 (UTC)1  Support Good quality. --E bailey 18:15, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Düsseldorf, klok op de Rhein Ufer Promenade IMG 6208 2025-01-26 14.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bochum-Dahlhausen, de Lütherkirche DmA228 IMG 6540 2025-03-16 11.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:21, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bochum, klokken - bellen bij de Jahrhunderthalle DmA395 IMG 6541 2025-03-16 14.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 20:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bochum, toren in de Jahrhunderthalle DmA395 IMG 6552 2025-03-16 14.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:53, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenheim, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Mariä Himmelfahrt Dm39 IMG 5187 2024-08-31 18.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, despite the noisy sky --MB-one 13:44, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enschede, de Ontmoetingskerk IMG 6423 2025-03-09 10.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enschede-Usselo, bistro Hanninkshof IMG 6428 2025-03-09 10.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enschede-Usselo, Wissinks Möl RM18883 IMG 6436 2025-03-09 11.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enschede-Boekelo, fabrieksgebouw-pakhuis stoomblekerij Van Heek&Co RM510621 IMG 6451 2025-03-09 11.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deventer, treinstation RM510716 IMG 6211 2025-02-02 10.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:46, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deventer, de Brink met RM12535 IMG 6220 2025-02-02 11.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deventer, de Lebuiniskerk RM12572 IMG 6272 2025-02-02 12.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenheim, straatzicht Am Hirtenturm IMG 5196 2024-08-31 18.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 15:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenheim, Hirtenturm Dm4 IMG 5216 2024-08-31 19.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:23, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hillesheim, Stadtbefestigung Dm en de katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin Dm IMG 5151 2024-08-31 12.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof van Twente-Hengevelde, de Petrus en Pauluskerk IMG 6470 2025-03-09 13.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:59, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof van Twente-Diepenheim, de Johanneskerk RM12874 IMG 6479 2025-03-09 13.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:48, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof van Twente-Markelo, de Martinuskerk RM28129 IMG 6490 2025-03-09 14.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:48, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof van Twente-Markelo, zendmast Markelo IMG 6501 2025-03-09 14.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --StPaul.jpg 08:18, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blankenheim, de Georgstor Dm52+169 IMG 5212 2024-08-31 19.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 07:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hardenberg-Balkbrug, molen De Star RM8453 IMG 6699 2025-04-20 12.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 06:52, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ommen, de Besthmenermolen RM31471 IMG 6729 2025-04-20 13.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 12:15, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Twenterand-Vroomshoop, het Overijssels kanaal met bedrijfspand (Hein Heun Sloopwerken en Asbestsanering BV) IMG 6748 2025-04-20 15.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:36, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bij Hellendoorn-Daarlerveen, zicht op het Overijssels kanaal IMG 6751 2025-04-20 15.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 06:52, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen-Lent, zicht op het dorp met de Maria Geboortekerk RM522594 en de Hervormde-Gereformeerde Kerk van Lent RM523035 IMG 6195 2024-12-23 12.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 07:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nijmegen-Lent, zicht op het dorp met de Maria Geboortekerk RM522594 en de Hervormde-Gereformeerde Kerk van Lent RM523035 IMG 6415 2025-03-02 14.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Kleefse Waard, windturbines langs de N325 IMG 6655 2025-04-06 15.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lochem-Almen, landgoed Ehzerwold IMG 6527 2025-03-09 16.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zutphen-Warnsveld, Huize Baank RM38326 IMG 6534 2025-03-09 16.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oost Gelre-Vragender, korenmolen de Vier Winden RM25825 IMG 6577 2025-04-06 09.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oost Gelre-Vragender, de Sint-Antonius van Paduakerk GM1586-VG02 IMG 6583 2025-04-06 10.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oost Gelre-Harreveld, molen Hermien RM25821 IMG 6609 2025-04-06 11.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 07:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oost Gelre-Harreveld, molen Hermien RM25821 IMG 6614 2025-04-06 11.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oude IJsselstreek-Varsseveld, molen De Engel RM39092 IMG 6623 2025-04-06 11.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 14:51, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oude IJsselstreek-Varsseveld, molen De Engel RM39092 IMG 6632 2025-04-06 11.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doetinchem, de Benninkmolen RM13087 IMG 6637 2025-04-06 12.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:21, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doetinchem, Silo Art - De Reizende Hond IMG 6648 2025-04-06 12.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:21, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montferland-Loil, de Onze Lieve Vrouwekerk GM1955-wiki-2 IMG 6652 2025-04-06 14.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:19, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lochem, boerderij aan de Gageldijk IMG 8554 2025-08-03 15.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:50, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lochem, boerderij aan de Vordense Binnenweg IMG 8560 2025-08-03 16.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:50, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deventer, de torens van de Sint-Nicolaas- of Bergkerk RM12416 IMG 6231 2025-02-02 11.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deventer, de Bolwerksmolen RM12467 IMG 6249 2025-02-02 12.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deventer, de Bolwerksmolen RM12467 IMG 6259 2025-02-02 12.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:24, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woerden-Zegveld, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk GM0632-WN115 IMG 8579c 2025-08-09 13.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 13:51, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woerden, stellingmolen de Windhond RM39309 IMG 8594a 2025-08-09 14.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:21, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Woerden, stellingmolen de Windhond RM39309 IMG 8595 2025-08-09 14.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 08:24, 2 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 08:28, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beverwijk, Akerendam (landgoed) RM409824 IMG 8318 2025-06-22 09.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:43, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiloo, de toren van de Witte Kerk RM213247 IMG 8370 2025-06-22 13.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 18:12, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heiloo, de Nijenburg RM529040 IMG 8375 2025-06-22 13.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 08:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castricum, de toren van de Sint-Pancratiuskerk GM0383-C48 IMG 8352 2025-06-22 11.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 16:54, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dohm, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Remigius Dm IMG 5134 2024-08-31 11.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Near tower's cross there is a dust on sky to remove. Chceck perspective too, tower is slightly leaning, but maybe is isn't perfect in situ? --Gower 06:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)  Done Removed dust and small perspective improvement --Michielverbeek 07:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC) A bit dark and PC not done, look at right, it's leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 02:16, 26 October 2025 (UTC) Thanks, I have  Done a new perspective improvement and I made the church a bit brighter --Michielverbeek 22:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Gower 19:28, 2 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Earth605 16:45, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alkmaar, het AFAS stadion IMG 8382 2025-06-22 13.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alkmaar-Zuidschermer, poldermolen K RM7085 IMG 8387 2025-06-22 14.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alkmaar-Zuidschermer, poldermolen K RM7085 IMG 8395 2025-06-22 14.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alkmaar-Zuidschermer, 't Zwarte Kerkje RM47090 en het dorpsschoolgebouw RM389142 IMG 8408 2025-06-22 15.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alkmaar-Grootschermer, de Menningweermolen RM33090 IMG 8419 2025-06-22 15.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alkmaar-Groot Schermer, windmolen De Havik RM33086 IMG 8431 2025-06-22 16.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 19:35, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alkmaar-Schermerhorn, Ondermolen D RM33105 en Bovenmolen E RM33101 IMG 8440 2025-06-22 16.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alkmaar-Schermerhorn, bovenmolen G RM33102 en Ondermolen K RM33103 IMG 8460 2025-06-22 16.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 08:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koggenland-Hensbroek, de Hervormde kerk RM31216 IMG 8468 2025-06-22 17.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koggenland-Obdam, wipmolen-poldermolen Weel & Braken RM31212 IMG 8473 2025-06-22 17.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:29, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opmeer-Spanbroek, de Hervormde kerk RM31798 IMG 8479 2025-06-22 18.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:31, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Medemblik-Wognum, de Hervormde kerk RM39315 IMG 8487 2025-06-22 19.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:31, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gooise Meren-Naarden, zicht op de Grote Kerk RM30223 IMG 8522 2025-06-29 12.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:31, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heemskerk, de Sint-Laurentiuskerk RM21204 IMG 8337 2025-06-22 10.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light balance could be improved to bring clarity to subject. --E bailey 16:14, 3 November 2025 (UTC) I  Done have made the main object a bit warmer and brighter --Michielverbeek 19:06, 7 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --E bailey 02:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lochem-Laren, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk RM25931 IMG 6518 2025-03-09 15.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tympanum slightly burned. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Thanks, I have improved  Done the tympanum a bit --Michielverbeek 20:01, 2 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good enough fix! --Earth605 16:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam-Watergraafsmeer, de Emmakerk RM506280 IMG 8496 2025-06-29 08.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diemen, straatzicht Harteveldseweg met Sint-Petrus-Bandenkerk RM509011 IMG 8497 2025-06-29 09.28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam-Driemond, de Gemeenschapsmolen RM504564 IMG 8501 2025-06-29 09.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Earth605 18:18, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam-Driemond, de Gemeenschapsmolen RM504564 IMG 8504 2025-06-29 09.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Earth605 07:32, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam-Weesp, de Lange Vechtbrug RM38533 IMG 8508 2025-06-29 10.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:33, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midden Delfland-Maasland, zicht op de Westgaag IMG 6799 2025-04-27 12.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:16, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midden Delfland-Maasland, sculptuur De Reiziger van Willem Berkhout IMG 6818 2025-04-27 13.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midden Delfland-Schipluiden, korenmolen De Korpershoek RM33380 IMG 6828 2025-04-27 13.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Earth605 06:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Hef RM513922 vanaf de Prins Hendrikkade IMG 0404 2025-09-13 22.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, de Willermsbrug IMG 0415 2025-09-13 23.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Midden Delfland-Schipluiden, de Trambrug RM521919 IMG 6823 2025-04-27 13.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Obviously the laternes are really that tilted, arn't they? --Milseburg 16:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC) For the verticals, the bridge has been my reference point --Michielverbeek 11:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, Erasmusbrug vanaf het Prinsenhoofd met sculptuur zonder titel van Herman Lamers IMG 0433 2025-09-14 00.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:14, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, kabels van de Erasmusbrug IMG 0438 2025-09-14 00.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very interesting, like abstract art. --Gower 20:58, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rotterdam, kabels van de Erasmusbrug IMG 0444 2025-09-14 00.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:19, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodegraven-Reeuwijk Bodegraven, olieslagerij De Phoenix, GM1901-WN027 IMG 8576 2025-09-08 12.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Llez 06:34, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, sculptuur de Engel van Maastricht ontworpen door Wil van der Laan IMG 6306 2025-02-23 10.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:34, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maastricht, de Antonius van Paduakerk RM28078 IMG 6319 2025-02-23 11.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eijsden-Margarten-Bemelen, de Sint-Laurentiuskerk RM34635 IMG 6325 2025-02-23 11.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but quite tight framing. --Gower 19:26, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eijsden-Margraten-Gasthuis, de Van Tienhovenmolen RM18236 IMG 6333 2025-02-23 11.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdaelen-Hunnecum, de molen van Hunnecum RM30936 IMG 6376 2025-02-23 13.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 07:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdaelen-Puth, de Petrus Canisiuskerk GM0962 IMG 6395 2025-02-23 15.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, voormalig fabrieksterrein bij de Rohrteichstrasse IMG 6857 2025-05-11 09.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, sculptuur van Zoo Leipzig IMG 6982 2025-05-11 14.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdaelen-Hunnecum, de molen van Hunnecum RM30936 IMG 6376 2025-02-23 13.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 07:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdaelen-Puth, de Petrus Canisiuskerk GM0962 IMG 6395 2025-02-23 15.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 20:22, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 15:40, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, Agyptisches Museum der Universitat Leipzig Dm IMG 6859 2025-05-11 09.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:40, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, Agyptisches Museum der Universitat Leipzig Dm IMG 6869 2025-05-11 09.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:42, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, het operagebouw Dm09290006 IMG 7020 2025-05-11 15.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, sculptuur Unzeitgemäße Zeitgenossen in de Grimmaischen Straße ontworpen door Bernd Göbel IMG 6874 2025-05-11 10.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:08, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, toren van de Nikolaikirche Dm09298362 IMG 6877 2025-05-11 10.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, Brunnen und Handschwengelpumpe mit Brunnenschacht op de Nachmarkt Dm09298442 IMG 6889 2025-05-11 10.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:06, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, Commerzbank in straatzicht Dm09298436 IMG 6913 2025-05-11 11.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 07:16, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, standbeeld Felix Mendelssohn deel van Dm09306630 IMG 6920 2025-05-11 11.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but appears to be slightly dark. --Pangalau 07:13, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, monumentaal zaken-en woonpand in de Otto Schill Strasse Dm09290925 IMG 6933 2025-05-11 11.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 07:13, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markranstädt-Quesitz, Dorfskirche Dm09258299 IMG 7045 2025-05-12 11.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need better crop. Clear white area at bottom --George Chernilevsky 06:52, 14 November 2025 (UTC) I don't understand what happened but now the white area is gone  Done --Michielverbeek 18:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 22:22, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, het Neue Rathaus Dm09304939 IMG 6948 2025-05-11 11.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:39, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, het Neue Rathaus Dm09304939 IMG 6958 2025-05-11 12.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, het Neue Rathaus Dm09304939 IMG 6999 2025-05-11 15.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, de toren van het Neue Rathaus Dm09304939 IMG 6993 2025-05-11 15.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Sulza-Wickerstedt, de evangelische Dorfkirche Sankt Vitus Dm IMG 7181 2025-05-13 12.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:28, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Sulza-Wickerstedt, de evangelische Dorfkirche Sankt Vitus Dm IMG 7185 2025-05-13 12.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:28, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apolda-Zottelstedt, de Steigerturm und Backhaus Dm IMG 7209 2025-05-13 13.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:28, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilmtal Weinstrasse-Mattstedt, de Dorfkirche Dm IMG 7193 2025-05-13 13.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:53, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilmtal Weinstrasse-Niederrossla, Heilig Kreuz Kirche IMG 7220 2025-05-13 13.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 06:36, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weimar, hoek Frauentorstrasse-Puschkinstrasse Dm IMG 7241 2025-05-13 16.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:53, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weimar, het Herder Denkmal Dm IMG 7281 2025-05-14 09.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 06:36, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2025 in Switzerland

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland, Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Switzerland , we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2025 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in Swiss WSC2025, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category by simply adding the national category (even if not uploaded with the main interface).

If you take part, please consider to provide a complete description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2026.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2025 #WikiScience #WikiScience2025

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--21:31, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kranichfeld-Barchfeld, zicht op het dorp IMG 7296 2025-05-14 12.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:25, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtilm, toren van het stadhuis Dm IMG 7309 2025-05-14 13.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:25, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Stadtilm-Grosshettstedt en Stadtilm, panorama IMG 7306 2025-05-14 13.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:25, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, monumentaal zaken-en woonpand in de Peters Strasse Dm09298399 IMG 6960 2025-05-11 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 06:24, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, de evangelische reformische Kirche Dm09290651 IMG 6972 2025-05-11 13.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 06:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilmenau-Roda, de Sankt Jakobuskirche Dm IMG 7348 2025-05-15 09.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:24, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elgersburg, Schloss Elgersburg Dm IMG 7361 2025-05-15 10.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:24, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnstadt, de Riedtor Dm IMG 7391 2025-05-15 12.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:20, 24 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 14:03, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnstadt, de Jakobskirche Dm IMG 7395 2025-05-15 12.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:20, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ilmenau, de Ratskeller Dm IMG 7341 2025-05-15 09.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:24, 23 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 14:07, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amt Wachsenburg-Thörey, evangelische Kirche Sankt Wenzel Dm in straatzicht IMG 7413 2025-05-15 14.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:27, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nesse Apfelstädt, de evangelische Kirche Sankt Nikolaus IMG 7420 2025-05-15 14.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:27, 25 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. But I would crop it to 5x4 at the bottom. --Syntaxys 06:29, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nesse Apfelstädt-Ingersleben, toren van de Dorfkirche Sankt Maria IMG 7432 2025-05-15 15.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:27, 25 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:29, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leipzig, de Thomaskirche Dm09290637 IMG 6906 2025-05-11 10.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Slightly  Underexposed in the shadows. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 09:04, 17 November 2025 (UTC)  Oppose  Not done --Augustgeyler 18:58, 23 November 2025 (UTC) Sorry for ignoring your request. I have  Done a new version --Michielverbeek 06:34, 25 November 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:53, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erfurt, monumentale panden aan het Domplatz Dm IMG 7433 2025-05-15 17.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:42, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erfurt, monumentale panden aan het Domplatz Dm IMG 7487 2025-05-15 19.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:54, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erfurt, monumentale panden aan het Domplatz IMG 7480 2025-05-15 18.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:36, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erfurt, monumentale panden aan het Domplatz Dm IMG 7490 2025-05-15 19.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:36, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erfurt, de Severikirche Dm IMG 7461 2025-05-15 18.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:26, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erfurt, de Allerheiligenkirche Dm IMG 7475 2025-05-15 18.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erfurt-Stotternheim, de evangelische Pfarrkirche Sankt Peter und Paul Dm IMG 7493 2025-05-16 10.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:54, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grossrudestedt-Schwansee, Dorfkirche Dm IMG 7500 2025-05-16 11.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:54, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lützen, Rathaus Dm09415475 IMG 7056 2025-05-12 12.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:46, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weißenfels, Sankt Marien Kirche Dm094-86685 IMG 7066 2025-05-12 13.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:46, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naumburg-Saaleck, de Sankt Laurentiuskirche Dm0945554 IMG 7158 2025-05-13 10.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:46, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naumburg, woonhuizen-bedrijfspanden op de Markt Dm094-80941tm3 IMG 7073 2025-05-12 17.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:05, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naumburg, toren van Stadtkirche Sankt Wenzel Dm094-80763 IMG 7080 2025-05-12 17.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:05, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naumburg, toren van Stadtkirche Sankt Wenzel Dm094-80763 IMG 7114 2025-05-12 19.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:31, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sömmerda, de evangelische Kirche Sankt Petri und Pauli Dm IMG 7512 2025-05-16 12.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but borderline sharpness partially (top of the tower) --Gower 17:32, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naumburg, Naumburger Dom Sankt Peter und Paul Dm09483830 IMG 7130 2025-05-13 08.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:34, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naumburg, Naumburger Dom Sankt Peter und Paul Dm09483830 IMG 7132 2025-05-13 08.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:34, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artern-Voigtstedt, evangelische Kirche Sankt Marien Dm IMG 7536 2025-05-17 10.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:24, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naumburg, de Marien Kirche Dm094-80932 met de Marientor Dm094-16307 op de achtergrond IMG 7089 2025-05-12 17.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:33, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Genthin-Schopsdorf, oorlogsmonument Dm094-71274 IMG 7661 2025-05-19 12.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziesar-Glienecke, de Dorfkirche Dm09190169 IMG 7673 2025-05-19 13.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuthetal-Saarmund, de evangelische Kirche Dm09190377 IMG 7705 2025-05-20 16.,28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:02, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gommern, Herz-Jesu-Kirche Dm094-76154 IMG 7594 2025-05-18 14.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:06, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, kantoorpanden aan de Ober Donaustrasse vanaf de Salztorbrücke IMG 7946 2025-05-24 16.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:09, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen-Landstraße , de Belvedere Schloss Garten positie1 IMG 7740 2025-05-24 09.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:13, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen-Landstraße, de Belvedere Schloss Garten positie2 IMG 7750 2025-05-24 09.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, monumentaal pand op het Schwarzenbergplatz IMG 7776 2025-05-24 10.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen-Favoriten, spiegeling in de ramen van het Hauptbahnhof IMG 7715 2025-05-24 08.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:05, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenzlow-Grüningen, de Dorfkirche Dm09190488 IMG 7691 2025-05-19 14.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wallhausen-Rietnordhausen, de Sankt Jacobikirche Dm094-84507 IMG 755 2025-05-17 11.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, tourist info op het Albertinaplatz IMG 7803 2025-05-24 11.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Earth605 16:37, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, standbeeld Erzherzog Albrecht-Denkmal auf der Albrechtsrampe Dm20125 ontworpen door Caspar von Zumbusch IMG 8069 2025-05-25 10.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (12 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, kantoor op Am Hof met ehemaliges bürgerliches Zeughaus, Feuerwehrzentrale Dm50507 IMG 7896 2025-05-24 14.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, Judenplatz met standbeeld Dm20939 en diverse monumentale panden Dm326543-32747-1206 IMG 7901 2025-05-24 14.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, Hofburg bij Sisimuseum IMG 7972 2025-05-24 16.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:44, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, standbeeld van Prinz Eugen von Savoy ontworpen door Anton Dominik Fernkorn Dm20139 IMG 7983 2025-05-24 17.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, zicht op het Rathaus Dm50427 vanaf de Hofburg IMG 7997 IMG 8020 2025-05-25 08.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:43, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, het Kaiser-Joseph-Denkmal Dm20133 ontworpen door Franz Anton von Zauner IMG 8089 2025-05-25 10.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:40, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, de Steindlgasse met Kirche am Hof Dm66273 in de achtergrond IMG 8125 2025-05-25 11.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:40, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, het Burgtheater Dm30699 IMG 8242 2025-05-26 14.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:26, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, standbeeld van Erzherzog Karl-Denkmal ontworpen door Anton Dominik Fernkorn Dm20216 IMG 8023 2025-05-25 09.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you crop a chunk at the bottom? the result would be much better --Poco a poco 07:36, 10 December 2025 (UTC) I did  Done a serious bottom crop --Michielverbeek 21:47, 10 December 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 18:11, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen-Alsergrund, de Alserkirche IMG 8294 2025-05-26 16.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:22, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen-Alsergrund, straatzicht Nussdorfer Strasse bij de Spitalgasse IMG 8302 2025-05-26 16.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, de Michaelertrakt Dm13765 met nadruk op centrale gedeelte IMG 8010 2025-05-25 08.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfavorable cropping (too much foreground), fixable? --F. Riedelio 15:39, 13 December 2025 (UTC) I did  Donea bottom crop and I removed some disturbing people --Michielverbeek 19:59, 13 December 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:58, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, ehemaliges Warenhaus Orendi Dm50315 met Gutenberg-Denkmal ontworpen door Max Fabiani (Architektur) en Hans Bitterlich (Bronzefigur) Dm447 IMG 7927 2025-05-24 15.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfavorable cropping (too much foreground), fixable? --F. Riedelio 11:24, 12 December 2025 (UTC) I did  Done a serious bottom crop --Michielverbeek 20:04, 13 December 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:59, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, straatzicht Gumpendorfer Strasse IMG 8172 2025-05-25 14.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (and interesting building btw) --Gower 15:25, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, standbeeld Karl Lueger Dm1999 ontworpen door Joseph Müllner Dm1999 IMG 8056 2025-05-25 10.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 08:26, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg bei Magdeburg, straatzicht Berlinier Weg met zicht op Unser Lieben Frauen Kirche Dm094-05664 IMG 7616 2025-05-19 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 12:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC) I have  Done brightened non-sky are and made new crops --Michielverbeek 20:40, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Brightened  Done sky a bit and new crops --Michielverbeek 20:01, 14 December 2025 (UTC)  Support Sadly grey whether, but quality is ok. --Milseburg 13:31, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg bei Magdeburg, Wasserturm auf dem Weinberg Dm094-05637 IMG 7621 2025-05-19 09.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 12:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC) I have  Done brightened non-sky are and made new crops --Michielverbeek 20:40, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Brightened  Done sky a bit and new crops --Michielverbeek 20:01, 14 December 2025 (UTC)  Support To me clearly above the QI-bar.--Milseburg 13:27, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg bei Magdeburg, de Berliner Torturm Dm094-05678 IMG 7633 2025-05-19 09.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 12:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC) I have  Done brightened non-sky are and made new crops --Michielverbeek 20:40, 13 December 2025 (UTC) Brightened  Done sky a bit and new crops --Michielverbeek 20:01, 14 December 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 17:11, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays! * 2026 !

	* Happy Holidays! *
	Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Joyeux Noël et bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches Neues Jahr! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Щасливого Різдва i з Новим роком! Boldog karácsonyt és boldog új évet! Καλά Χριστούγεννα και καλή χρονιά!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:02, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, to you the same! Michielverbeek (talk) 18:45, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

...and a Happy New Year.

Warm greetings from Italy. Terragio67 (talk) 17:18, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, to you the same! Michielverbeek (talk) 18:45, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Merry Christmas and warm wishes for a joyful, healthy, and peaceful New Year 2026! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, standbeeld Gotthold-Ephraim-Lessing ontworpen door Siegfried Charoux Dm20939 IMG 79052025-05-24 15.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments quite dark --Gower 08:21, 16 December 2025 (UTC)  Done Brighter and new crops --Michielverbeek 21:26, 17 December 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Gower 21:21, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wenen, Hoher Markt met Vermählingsbrunnen Dm20922 en monumentaal Anker-Uhr Dm88451 IMG 7924 2025-05-24 15.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments underexposed and not right PC --Gower 11:19, 14 December 2025 (UTC)  Done small perspective correction and a bit brighter --Michielverbeek 20:29, 14 December 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Gower 21:21, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart, toren van het Alten Schlosses IMG 8638 2025-08-10 17.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:24, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart, industriegebied Stuttgart Ost IMG 8694 2025-08-11 11.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:11, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ploichingen, Ottilienkapelle Dm IMG 8716 2025-08-11 13.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchheim unter Teck, Strassebild Marktstrasse met waarschijnlijk Dm100214040 (links) en zeker Dm1102140 2025-08-11 16.16 (rechts) IMG 8728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neidlingen, gemeentehuis Dm1205260 IMG 8768 2025-08-12 10.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart, toren van het Alten Schlosses IMG 8638 2025-08-10 17.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:24, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart, industriegebied Stuttgart Ost IMG 8694 2025-08-11 11.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:11, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Westerheim en Wiesensteig, wegpanorama MG 8784 2025-08-12 13.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:01, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Laichingen en Laichingen-Feldstetten, wegpanorama IMG 8833 2025-08-14 10.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:25, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laichingen-Feldstetten, dorpszicht IMG 8842 2025-08-14 11.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:25, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Laichingen en Westerheim, panorama IMG 8882 2025-08-14 14.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laichingen, Weberei- und Heimatmuseum Dm1190868 met op de achtergrond de evangelische Pfarrkirche (Sankt Alban) Dm 1210709 IMG 8794a 2025-08-12 16.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:38, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laichingen, stadhuis Dm1210713 IMG 8797 2025-08-13 09.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:06, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laichingen, café bistro Linde IMG 8821 2025-08-14 09.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:29, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laichingen-Suppingen, Pfarrkirche Sankt Brigita Dm1210729 IMG 8888 2025-08-15 11.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:29, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (12 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schelklingen-Schmiechen, Pfarrkirche Sankt Vitus Dm1211469 IMG 8928 2025-08-15 14.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:29, 9 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obermarchtal-Datthausen, Filialkapelle Sankt Georg Dm102587709 IMG 9001 2025-08-16 11.43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:29, 9 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obermarchtal, Rathaus IMG 8992 2025-08-16 12.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:29, 9 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehingen (Donau), Ständehaus der schwäbisch-österreichischen Landstände Dm103229399 IMG 8942 2025-08-15 17.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:38, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehingen, fontein de Marktbrunnen ontworpen door Kurt Grabert IMG 8947 2025-08-15 17.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:47, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehingen, de Konviktskirche IMG 8969 2025-08-15 17.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehingen-Berg, Brauerei Wirtschaft Berg IMG 8978 2025-08-16 10.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:29, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart, Reiterstandbild Kaiser Wilhelm I Dm IMG 8645 2025-08-10 17.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:03, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart, Reiterstandbild Kaiser Wilhelm I Dm IMG 8665 2025-08-10 18.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:03, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedlingen-Zwiefaltendorf, dorpszicht IMG 9004 2025-08-16 13.01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 07:48, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedlingen-Zell, Kirche Sankt Gallus IMG 9023 2025-08-16 13.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:21, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedlingen-Daugendorf, Kirche Sankt Leonhard IMG 9039 2025-08-16 14.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:22, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:50, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedlingen, Stadtkirche Sankt Georg Dm IMG 9062 2025-08-16 16.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:29, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedlingen, straatzicht Lange Strasse met diverse Dm IMG 9067 2025-08-16 16.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riedlingen, Weilerkapelle Snkt Maria und Vierzehn Nothelfer Dm IMG 9075 2025-08-16 17.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altheim (bei Riedlingen), katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin Dm96611379 IMG 9078 2025-08-17 10.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Saulgau, toren van de katholische Stadtpfarrkirche Sankt Johannes de Täufer Dm1214573 en stadsmuur+toren IMG 9098 2025-08-17 13.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altshausen, Schloss Altshausen Dm1206108 IMG 9113 2025-08-17 14.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A little blurry on the right-hand side, but OK --Benjism89 07:12, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altshausen-Stuben, katholische Kapelle Sankt Joseph Dm103611317 IMG 9117 2025-08-17 15.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:37, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wolpertswende, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Gangolf Dm103219391 IMG 9127 2025-08-17 15.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 06:37, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ravensburg, de Obertor Dm IMG 9141 2025-08-17 17.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:51, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ravensburg, de Grüner Turm Dm IMG 9149 2025-08-17 17.59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:12, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Argenbühl-Eisenharz, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Benedikt Dm IMG 9587 2025-08-23 14.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:47, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isny im Allgäu-Grossholzleute-Kleinhaslach, kerk IMG 9652 2025-08-24 09.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:45, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isny im Allgäu-Grossholzleute-Kleinholzleute, kapel Dm102910531 IMG 9664 2025-08-24 10.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:26, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:52, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isny im Allgäu, de Blaserturm Dm IMG 9611 2025-08-23 16.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isny in Allgäu, de Espantor Dm IMG 9619 2025-08-23 17.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rohit14400 06:24, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isny in Allgäu, sculptuur voor Kinder und Heimatfest ontworpen door Leo Wirth IMG 9626 2025-08-23 17.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rohit14400 06:25, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isny im Allgäu, de watertoren (binnenkant) Dm IMG 9635 2025-08-23 17.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rohit14400 06:24, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meckenbeuren, stationsgebouw Dm100472854 IMG 9150 2025-08-18 10.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:19, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meckenbeuren, Kirche Sankt Maria IMG 9159 2025-08-18 11.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:19, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meckenbeuren, Kirche Sankt Maria IMG 9168 2025-08-18 11.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:37, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isny im Allgäu-Grossholzleute-Argen, kerk IMG 9669 2025-08-24 10.44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrichshafen-Flughafen, het Dornier Museum Friedrichshafen IMG 9195 2025-08-18 12.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eriskirch, de Alte Schule IMG 9201 2025-08-18 13.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langenargen, Zollhaus Dm IMG 9208 2025-08-18 14.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments "  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kressbronn am Bodensee-Tunau, de Sankt Josefs-Kapelle Dm IMG 9216 2025-08-18 14.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:16, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:50, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulm, straatzicht Unter der Metzig met Dm IMG 0282 2025-08-31 10.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:35, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulm, de Metzgerturm Dm met stadsmuur IMG 0296 2025-08-31 10.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:31, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:52, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulm, de toren van de Ulmer Münster Dm vanaf Unter der Metzig IMG 0289 2025-08-31 10.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulm, de Ulmer Münster vanaf Am Lederhof IMG 0335 2025-08-31 14.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulm, de Ulmer Münster vanaf de Neue Strasse IMG 0351 2025-08-31 14.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulm, de toren van de Ulmer Münster Dm gespiegeld in het Buddha Restaurant IMG 0305 2025-08-31 11.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulm, de toren van de Ulmer Münster Dm vanaf het Buddha Restaurant IMG 0313 2025-08-31 11.09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:21, 20 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Nice framing --JackyM59 06:25, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulm, de toren van de Ulmer Münster Dm met de Donau vanaf het Buddha Restaurant IMG 0315 2025-08-31 11.10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:37, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau, Neuer Leuchturm en Löwen Monument D-7-76-116-329 IMG 9218 2025-08-18 17.23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau, Neuer Leuchturm en Löwen Monument D-7-76-116-329 IMG 9224 2025-08-18 17.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau, Mangturm IMG 9231 2025-08-18 17.40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:32, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau, Löwen Monument D-7-76-116-329 IMG 9252 2025-08-18 20.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:32, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris, de Basilique du Sacré-Cœur IMG 0479 2025-12-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:52, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hergatz-Itzlings, katholische Marienkapelle DmD-7-76-131-2 IMG 9550 2025-08-23 12.48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:56, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hergatz-Maria Thann, katholische Pfarr- und Wallfahrtskirche zu Unserer Lieben Frau DmD-7-76-131-4 IMG 9562 2025-08-23 13.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:56, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hergatz-Edelitz, dorpszicht IMG 9568 2025-08-23 13.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:56, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heimenkirch-Syrgenstein, Schloss Syrgenstein DmD-7-76-114-13 IMG 9574 2025-08-23 14.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 07:56, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weitnau-Wengen, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Johannes der Täufer DmD-7-80-144-24 in straatzicht IMG 9678 2025-08-24 11.12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:29, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Buchenberg en Wiggensbach-Ermengerst, panorama IMG 9698 2025-08-24 12.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:58, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiggensbach-Ermengerst, Filialkirche Sankt Johannes der Täufer DmD-7-80-146-9 IMG 9718 2025-08-24 13.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:29, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kempten (Allgäu), Mühlrad in de Gerberstrasse IMG 9763 2025-08-24 16.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 25 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 12:22, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kempten (Allgäu), Kempten Museum in het Zumstein Haus D-7-63-000-201 IMG 9774 2025-08-25 08.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 25 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 12:22, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kempten (Allgäu), Cafe Waisentor in straatzicht IMG 9776 2025-08-25 09.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Borderline in terms of distortion --Poco a poco 09:11, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kempten (Allgäu), katholische Stadtpfarrkirche Sankt Lorenz DmD-7-63-000-231 IMG 9730 2025-08-24 15.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Soft a bit. Can you make it sharper please? --Екатерина Борисова 02:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC) I don't think this photo is not sharp enough, but I have add  Done contrast and made it a bit brighter --Michielverbeek 21:37, 25 January 2026 (UTC)  Support It's still a little bit soft, but looks much better, thanks. --Екатерина Борисова 03:29, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulm, Martin Luther Kirche IMG 0254 2025-08-31 09.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments too dark --Gower 12:46, 16 January 2026 (UTC) Thanks, brighter and new crops  Done --Michielverbeek 21:12, 21 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Dark a bit, but imho QI, feel free to send it to CR. --Юрий Д.К. 02:04, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obergünzburg, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin DmD-7-77-154-17 IMG 9828 2025-08-25 12.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obergünzburg-Ebersbach, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankr Ulrich DmD-7-77-154-35 IMG 9832 2025-08-25 14.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aitrang-Wenglingen, Kapelle Sankt Rosina DmD-7-77-111-18 IMG 9852 2025-08-25 14.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulm, het stadhuis Dm vanaf de Neue Strasse IMG 0349 2025-08-31 14.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments too strong PC on the right, leaning wall --Gower 18:59, 18 January 2026 (UTC) Thanks, small perspective improvement  Done --Michielverbeek 20:58, 21 January 2026 (UTC) OK for me. Feel free to send to CR. --Юрий Д.К. 15:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (31 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudertshofen-Apfeltrang, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Michael DmD-7-77-167-6 IMG 9855 2025-08-25 15.18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:30, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kaufbeuren-Sankt Cosmas, katholische Kongregations- und Wallfahrtskirche Sankt Cosmas und Damian DmD-7-62-000-244 IMG 9867 2025-08-25 15.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:30, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pforzen, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Valentin DmD-7-77-158-3 IMG 9906 2025-08-26 09.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:30, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau, Neuer Leuchturm D-7-76-116-329 IMG 9244 2025-08-18 20.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen-Schlingen, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Martin DmD-7-78-116-36 IMG 9907 2025-08-26 10.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:11, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Wörishofen, Gasthof Rössle IMG 9917 2025-08-26 10.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:11, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Türkheim, Ludwigstor DmD-7-78-203-58 IMG 9919 2025-08-26 11.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 07:00, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau, Neuer Leuchturm D-7-76-116-329 IMG 92222025-08-18 17.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau, Neuer Leuchturm D-7-76-116-329 IMG 9226 2025-08-18 17.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindau, Neuer Leuchturm D-7-76-116-329 IMG 9241 2025-08-18 17.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wehringen, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Georg DmD-7-72-215-3 IMG 9970 2025-08-27 10.50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:16, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grossaitingen, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Nikolaus DmD-7-72-151-1 IMG 9975 2025-08-27 11.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:38, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grossaitingen, katholische Kapelle Sankt Sebastian DmD-7-72-151-15 IMG 9988 2025-08-27 11.39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:38, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grossaitingen-Reinhartshofen, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Jakobus DmD-7-72-151-19 IMG 9994 2025-08-27 12.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:38, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bobingen-Reinhartshausen, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Laurentius DmD-7-72-125-20 IMG 0001 2025-08-27 12.42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 31 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 12:00, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bobingen-Strasssberg, de Alte Schule IMG 0019 2025-08-27 14.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:28, 31 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 12:00, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fischach-Tronetshofen, katholische Kapelle Sankt Leonhard DmD-7-72-141-17 IMG 0102 2025-08-29 11.57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 08:35, 31 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 12:00, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balzhausen, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Vitus DmD-7-74-115-1 IMG 0130 2025-08-29 14.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Breitenthal, katholische Pfarrkirche Heilig Kreuz DmD-7-74-117-1 IMG 0182 2025-08-30 09.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augsburg, ehemalige Gaststätte Riegele (sogenannter Riegele-Block) DmD-7-61-000-198 IMG 0029 2025-08-27 17.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augsburg, Augustusbrunnen op het Rathausplatz DmD-7-61-000-823 IMG 0054 2025-08-28 08.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augsburg, straatzicht Margareten Strasse met op de voorgrond de ehemalige Dominikanerinnenklosterkirche Sankt Margareth (jetzt katholische Spitalkirche) DmD-7-61-000-960 naar Sankt Ulrich Dom IMG 0069 2025-08-28 09.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:43, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Augsburg, Rotes Tor DmD-7-61-000-60 IMG 0075 2025-08-28 09.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:08, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumbach (Schwaben), straatzicht Bahnhofstrasse naar de Kammel IMG 0157 2025-08-29 17.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:27, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumbach (Schwaben), de Mühlkapelle DmD-7-74-150-18 IMG 0171 2025-08-29 17.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krumbach (Schwaben), zicht op Marktplatz IMG 0178 2025-08-29 17.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roggenburg-Ingstetten, dorpszicht IMG 0192 2025-08-30 10.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:12, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roggenburg-Ingstetten, katholische Filialkirche Sankt Agatha DmD-7-75-149-20 IMG 0196 2025-08-30 10.53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:46, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aichen-Memmenhausen, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Georg DmD-7-74-166-4 IMG 0120 2025-08-29 13.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:05, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tussen Senden-Witzighausen en Weissenhorn, panorama IMG 0220 2025-08-30 12.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senden-Witzighausen, katholische Pfarr- und Wallfahrtskirche Mariä Geburt DmD-7-75-152-14 IMG 0222 2025-08-30 13.07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senden-Hittistetten, katholische Kapelle Sankt Leonhard DmD-7-75-152-13 IMG 0231 2025-08-30 13.26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:57, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Senden-Hittistetten, katholische Kapelle Sankt Leonhard DmD-7-75-152-13 IMG 0236 2025-08-30 13.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:28, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neu Ulm-Reutti, evangelische Pfarrkirche Sankt Margaretha DmD-7-75-135-89 IMG 0244 2025-08-30 13.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altstätten, de evangelische Kirche KGS08079 IMG 9464 2025-08-22 11.30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marbach, de katholische Kirche Sankt Georg KGS08187 IMG 9471a 2025-08-22 12.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balgach, katholische Kirche Heilige drei Könige KGS14007 IMG 9477 2025-08-22 12.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Au-Heerbrugg, katholische Kirche Bruder Klaus KGS16671 IMG 9484 2025-08-22 12.56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Au, toren van katholische Kirche Maria Geburt KGS14005 IMG 9504 2025-08-22 13.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:35, 6 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Igor123121 10:26, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bodenmeer, zicht op het Bodenmeer vanaf Bregenz IMG 9256 2025-08-19 10.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hohenems, Kapelle Sankt Johann Nepomuk Dm5401 IMG 9287 2025-08-19 14.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rankweil-Brederis, Kirche zur heiligen Anna Dm65143 IMG 9440 2025-08-22 09.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:52, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch, de Katzenturm Dm65259 IMG 9308 2025-08-19 17.22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:13, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch, de Churer Tor Dm30992 IMG 9316 2025-08-19 17.31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:13, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch, de Churer Tor Dm30992 IMG 9377 2025-08-21 11.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:29, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roggenburg-Biberach, katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Sebastian und Ottilia DmD-7-75-149-14 IMG 0210 2025-08-30 11.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch, de Dompfarrkirche Sankt Nikolaus Dm65250 IMG 9340 2025-08-20 17.27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch, het Pfarrhof Dm65251 IMG 9421 2025-08-21 12.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch,de katholische Filialkirche Sankt Johannes der Täufer Dm65264 IMG 9414 2025-08-21 12.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch, straatzicht Marktplatz met diverse Dm (Marktplatz 2-14even en 5+7) IMG 9346 2025-08-20 17.41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 17:52, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch, de Schattenburg Dm121116 IMG 9330 2025-08-20 17.15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you please brighten it a bit up and apply some denoising? --Poco a poco 12:29, 8 February 2026 (UTC)  Done This morning I made a bit brighter, reduced some noise and made it a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 08:16, 12 February 2026 (UTC)  Support Looks better, thank you --Poco a poco 08:33, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch, de Montfortbrunnen Dm68740 IMG 9357 2025-08-21 09.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feldkirch, voormalig Gasthof Lingg Dm68695 IMG 9366 2025-08-21 09.51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Aigle romain de Dalheim This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tussen Filsdorf en Welfrange, gedenkteken foto3 2017-05-26 14.02.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:16, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

I did not know that it was not allowed to take a picture from this monument, so it need to be removed --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:15, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (31 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lochem-Barchem, de Nederlands Hervormde kerk GM062-LCH30 IMG 0692 2026-03-08 15.54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 21:22, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arnhem-Schuytgraaf, sculptuur A Doodle ontworpen door Arash Fakhim IMG 0708 2026-03-09 10.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 09:24, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Overbetuwe-Herveld, standerdmolen De Vink RM36753 IMG 0682 2026-03-02 17.04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Overbetuwe-Heteren, kunstwerk Bloesem van de Groei & Bloei Kunstroute ontworpen door Barbara Recourt en Fons Broess IMG 0712 2026-03-09 11.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:49, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Overbetuwe- Randwijk, de Hervormde kerk RM21985 IMG 0720 2026-03-09 11.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:49, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renkum, sculptuur op de Dorpsstraat met de toren van de Hervormde kerk op op de achtergrond IMG 0764 2026-03-09 15.11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:49, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boekel, de Sint-Agathakerk RM518257 IMG 0646 2026-03-02 12.36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 07:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boekel, standerdmolen Boekel RM9773 IMG 0650 2026-03-02 12.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 07:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maashorst-Volkel, gesloten standerdmolen De Neije Kreiter RM35831 IMG 0654 2026-03-02 13.16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 07:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bernheze-Nistelrode, korenmolen Windlust RM30634 IMG 0666 2026-03-02 14.14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 07:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zutphen, treinstation in de sneeuw IMG 0488 2026-01-04 13.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:44, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zutphen, treinstation in de sneeuw IMG 0488 2026-01-04 13.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:44, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lochem, Oosterwal-Graaf Ottoweg in de sneeuw vanaf de Nieuwstad met RM25925 IMG 0497 2026-01-04 14.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Redlinks in the categories, fixble? --F. Riedelio 06:44, 29 March 2026 (UTC) Sorry  Done, I forgot to check this --Michielverbeek 07:17, 29 March 2026 (UTC) Not fully completed. --F. Riedelio 13:01, 31 March 2026 (UTC)  Done --Michielverbeek 08:20, 1 April 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 14:39, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heusden-Drunen, Feestcafé de 7euve Lantaarns op het Heinekenplein 10.38 IMG 0791 2026-03-22 10.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 12:56, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waalwijk, het Mandemakersstadion van RKC IMG 0799 2026-03-22 11.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:26, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loon op Zand-Kaatsheuvel, Molen de Couwenbergh RM527688 IMG 0842 2026-03-22 12.32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:33, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loon op Zand-De Moer, de Sint Joachimkerk RM524407 IMG 0847 2026-03-22 13.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:00, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dongen, de Sint-Laurentiuskerk RM517190 IMG 0858 2026-03-22 14.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:00, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waalwijk, de Sint Janskerk RM444705 IMG 0814 2026-03-22 11.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs some PC (tower is leaning to the left) --D-Kuru 15:27, 4 April 2026 (UTC) Thanks, perspective correction  Done --Michielverbeek 20:13, 4 April 2026 (UTC)  Support Changes applied. Good quality. --D-Kuru 22:58, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, Herengracht 100tm122 met RM1733tm43 IMG 0883 2026-04-06 09.13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 17:00, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, Herengracht 72tm116 met RM1722tm41 IMG 0888 2026-04-06 09.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 17:52, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, Herengracht 48tm78 met RM1711tm24 IMG 0901 2026-04-06 09.33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 17:52, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, de Brouwersgracht vanaf de WestIndische Huisbrug met RM2449 op de Keizersgracht IMG 0913 2026-04-06 09.52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:02, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, de Brouwersgracht vanaf de brug bij de Keizersgracht met RM2449+50 op de Keizersgracht IMG 0916 2026-04-06 10.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:03, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, Herengracht 134tm148 met RM1747-9 en RM1751-2 IMG 0875 2026-04-06 09.06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadows too dark imo. Fixable? Overall good. --Юрий Д.К. 19:20, 19 April 2026 (UTC)  Done Shadows are less darker now --Michielverbeek 11:21, 20 April 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 17:08, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, Keizersgracht 182tm196 met RM2518tm25 en op de achtergrond de toren van de Westerkerk RM4298 IMG 0957 2026-04-06 11.00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:12, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, hoek Keizersgracht (met RM2341tm46) - Leidsegracht (met RM3358tm62) IMG 1031 2026-04-06 12.37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:43, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, gebouw Felix Meritis RM2580 met monumentaal pand aan de Keizersgracht RM2579 IMG 1004 2026-04-06 12.03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 16:21, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, confectieatelier op de Keizersgracht 440 RM518356 IMG 1022 2026-04-06 12.24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, huis met vijf bouwlagen in internationale eclectische trant aan de Keizersgracht RM408905 IMG 1038 2026-04-06 12.49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:11, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, kantoorgebouw Garant BBVA International op de Keizersgracht RM518346 IMG 1055 2026-04-06 13.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:41, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, de Walter Süskindbrug IMG 1082 2026-04-06 14.17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, de Walter Süskindbrug IMG 1087 2026-04-06 14.19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, de Blauwbrug RM518352 met de Stopera op de achtergrond IMG 1091 2026-04-06 14.29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, de Stopera vanaf de Blauwbrug IMG 1096 2026-04-06 14.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, de Mozes en Aäronkerk RM6305 IMG 1103 2026-04-06 14.47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:17, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, Keizersgracht 272tm284 met RM2558tm65 IMG 0995 2026-04-06 11.55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 17:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, de Onze-Lieve-Vrouwekerk RM2535 IMG 0972 2026-04-06 11.21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:44, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, Keizersgracht 124tm138 met RM2496tm2501 IMG 0935 2026-04-06 10.38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:44, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amsterdam, kantoorgebouw Garant BBVA International op de Keizersgracht RM518346 IMG 1056 2026-04-06 13.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 07:24, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westerwolde-Vlagtwedde, de Hervormde kerk RM37455 IMG 1123 2026-04-26 12.08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 05:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinkelland-Tilligte, de Sint-Simon en Judaskerk GM1774-33 IMG 1249 2026-04-28 16.02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 05:54, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinkelland-Ootmarsum, de toren van de Hervormde kerk RM31750 IMG 1251b 2026-04-28 16.34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:50, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinkelland-Ootmarsum, de Molen van Oude Hengel RM31765 IMG 1255 2026-04-28 16.46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:51, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dinkelland-Ootmarsum, sculptuur de Commandeur op het Ben Morshuisplein ontworpen door Mathilde Damhuis IMG 1258 2026-04-28 16.58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:52, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:54, 8 May 2026 (UTC)