User talk:Tournasol7

My main page

Discuss

Quality images

Featured pictures

Valued pictures

Archives 11 November 2009 – 16 July 2017 17 July 2017 – 11 September 2017 12 September 2017 – 4 December 2017 5 December 2017 – 14 February 2018 15 February 2018 – 29 April 2018 30 April 2018 – 29 June 2018 29 June 2018 – 27 August 2018 28 August 2018 - 26 October 2018 26 October 2018 - 21 December 2018 22 December 2018 - 16 February 2019 17 February 2019 - 17 April 2019 18 April 2019 - 18 June 2019 19 June 2019 - 12 August 2019 13 August 2019 - 22 October 2019 23 October 2019 - 11 January 2020 11 January 2020 - 6 April 2020 6 April 2020 - 25 July 2020 26 July 2020 - 29 November 2020 30 November 2020 - 13 February 2021 13 February 2021 - 3 April 2021 4 April 2021 - 22 May 2021 23 May 2021 - 6 July 2021 7 July 2021 - 17 August 2021 1 October 2021 - 30 September 2021 18 August 2021 - 27 November 2021 28 November 2021 - 19 January 2022 20 January 2022 - 6 April 2022 7 April 2022 - 29 July 2022 30 July 2022 - 4 November 2022 2 November 2022 - 31 January 2023 1 February 2023 - 6 May 2023 7 May 2023 - 12 August 2023 13 August 2023 - 14 November 2023 15 November 2023 - 29 January 2024 30 January 2024 - 20 April 2024 21 April 2024 - 6 July 2024 7 July 2024 - 25 September 2024 26 September 2024 - 8 December 2024 9 December 2024 - 20 February 2025 21 February 2025 - 2 May 2025 3 May 2025 - 20 July 2025 20 July 2025 - 16 November 2025 16 November 2025 - 6 Mars 2025

Quality Image Promotion (07 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Goettingen (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 01:55, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Goettingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 01:55, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Goettingen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange-Geismar-Strasse 17 in Goettingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Brihaspati 02:12, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good for me --Jebulon 18:30, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Phyrexian 20:31, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old bridge in Belcastel (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 18:18, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obere Karspuele 4 in Goettingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:49, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Goettingen (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Goettingen (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weender Strasse 64 in Goettingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weender Landstrasse 2 in Goettingen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Goettingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Goettingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Touat in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascade des Palanges (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:05, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Leon church in St-Leons (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:05, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johanniskirchhof 2 in Goettingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:34, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannisstrasse 29 in Goettingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange-Geismar-Strasse 8 in Goettingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange-Geismar-Strasse 17 in Goettingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange-Geismar-Strasse 30 in Goettingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oratory in Gramond (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 10:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Anthimus and Saturninus church in Brommat 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 10:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:30, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mauerturm in Goettingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johanniskirchhof 2 in Goettingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obere Karspuele 10 in Goettingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alban of Mainz church in Goettingen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortified Church of Inieres (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:40, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:57, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel Le Normant d'Ayssenes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:57, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 21:30, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Goettingen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Groner-Tor-Strasse 29a in Göttingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Goettingen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Goettingen (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weender Strasse 64 in Goettingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St James Zebedaei church in Goettingen (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (12 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albanikirchhof 7 in Goettingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:35, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weender Landstrasse 2 in Goettingen (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Godehard basilica in Hildesheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:33, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Hildesheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:33, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15th-century house in Brommat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bousquet Castle in Montpeyroux 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolmen de Vezinies III 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Godehard basilica in Hildesheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:11, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Hildesheim (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:45, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:11, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas chapel in Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 01:25, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:11, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de Layoule in Rodez 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 01:24, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old bridge in Belcastel (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 01:24, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rodez 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:43, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Austremonius church in Salles-la-Source (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:19, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albanikirchhof 7 in Goettingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:35, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weender Landstrasse 2 in Goettingen (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Godehard basilica in Hildesheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:33, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Hildesheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:33, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15th-century house in Brommat 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bousquet Castle in Montpeyroux 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolmen de Vezinies III 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Cassagnes-Begonhes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:22, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascade de Saunhac 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:22, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Place Jean Boudou in Naucelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:22, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Godehard basilica in Hildesheim (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruehl 21 in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Hildesheim (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:34, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:02, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Hildesheim (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 00:32, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Veuzac (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit oversharpened but good.--Jebulon 17:36, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:16, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Bonald in Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Vors 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:13, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain at Place de l'Eglise in Agen-d'Aveyron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:13, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Anthimus and Saturninus church in Brommat 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:41, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Godehard basilica in Hildesheim (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 01:11, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Hildesheim (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:13, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osterstrasse 1a in Hildesheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:13, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice --Lmbuga 02:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Godehard basilica in Hildesheim (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Hildesheim (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Hildesheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Godehard basilica in Hildesheim (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:01, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Hildesheim (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:01, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Hildesheim (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:01, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:01, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commandery tower in Ste-Eulalie-de-Cernon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:26, 14 March 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 07:07, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruisseau des Palanges (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice slow speed yarn --JackyM59 07:07, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour Garnier de Mauriac in Ste-Eulalie-de-Cernon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --D-Kuru 10:05, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Goettingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Hildesheim (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:40, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Hildesheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:00, 16 March 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Hildesheim (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 02:39, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Hildesheim (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 02:39, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:40, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caravane du Tour de France 2019 in Rodez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:40, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16 Rue Saint-Christophe in Sauveterre-de-R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments (Repeat) Looks good, but maybe it'll be better to make the composition more symmetric. --Екатерина Борисова 02:59, 16 March 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:02, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Radegund church in Ste-Radegonde (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:37, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Assumption of Our Lady in Centres 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:37, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 Rue de Bonald in Rodez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:09, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of St Michael church in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 05:37, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Radegund church in Ste-Radegonde (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Hildesheim (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Hildesheim (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:17, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Hildesheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinterer Bruehl 15 in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinterer Bruehl 20 in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:27, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osterstrasse 1a in Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:14, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Hildesheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:26, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas chapel in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:14, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice. --Lmbuga 01:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Radegund church in Ste-Radegonde (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Hildesheim (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Hildesheim (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:17, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Hildesheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinterer Bruehl 15 in Hildesheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'Armagnac in Rodez 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steven Sun 02:29, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Herzberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:57, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary cathedral in Hildesheim (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:57, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinterer Bruehl 15 in Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:03, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinterer Bruehl 19 in Hildesheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:03, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:03, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! National horse stud farm in Rodez 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support High quality, very sharp throughout the image. --Radomianin 21:24, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Blaise church in Meljac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:47, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruisseau des Palanges (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:42, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:40, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Junkernstrasse 9 in Herzberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:56, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Herzberg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vitorperrut555 01:19, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Herzberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:56, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Herzberg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:40, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Naucelle 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:42, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Le Bosc 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 07:42, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Herzberg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Herzberg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Giles church in Osterode (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Osterode (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:01, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Rieupeyroux (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 11:22, 20 March 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:23, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Saint-Barthelemy in Najac 00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:25, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:25, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Sauveterre-de-Rouergue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Quirinus church in Montjaux 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:02, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bousquet Castle in Montpeyroux 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:02, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good QI.--Jebulon 01:48, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Giles church in Osterode (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 00:22, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 14:20, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Haute Alphonse de Poitiers in Najac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 14:21, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 14:21, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrew church in Hildesheim (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Christopher church in Sauveterre-de-R (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:31, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FD La Roquette-Bonneval 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:33, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael church in Hildesheim (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:09, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Herzberg (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Herzberg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Osterode (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Wache in Northeim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruisseau des Palanges (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:11, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Herzberg (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Herzberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Osterode (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Visitation of the Virgin Mary church in Northeim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:04, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Herzberg (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:54, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Herzberg (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:54, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Osterode (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:54, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Wache in Northeim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:39, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Sixtus church in Northeim (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:54, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lot river in Espalion (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:56, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7-9 Rue du Sault in Le Monastere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:56, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Anthimus and Saturninus church in Brommat 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:56, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 Place Adrien Rozier in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 18:52, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lot river in Espalion (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 19:41, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5 Rue d'Armagnac in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 19:41, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Sixtus church in Northeim (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Osterode (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Herzberg (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:02, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Herzberg (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:01, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rollberg 32 in Osterode (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:02, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Wache in Northeim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:01, 26 March 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:04, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entenmarkt 14 in Northeim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:02, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic view of Conques 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:23, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Joseph church in Herzberg (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:47, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruins of the Osterode Castle (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:47, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall in Osterode (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:47, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Giles church in Osterode (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:14, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Sixtus church in Northeim (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:01, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Roquetaillade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:51, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascade des Palanges (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 23:47, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Place de la Cite in Rodez (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 23:47, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch church in Albinhac 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:05, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Barriac Bozouls (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 12:35, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17 boulevard d'Estourmel in Rodez (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:04, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (31 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Soltau (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:38, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Steinbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:38, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin Luther church in Soltau (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:19, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poststrasse 7 in Soltau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:38, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poststrasse 10 in Soltau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:38, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Giles church in Osterode (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 10:33, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Osterode (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 10:33, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entenmarkt 14 in Northeim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit underexposed but ok --Poco a poco 10:20, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Visitation of the Virgin Mary church in Northeim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FalantoTaras 11:23, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Soltau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:20, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramic view of La Couvertoirade 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:20, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Bessuejouls 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:22, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Soltau (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:54, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Steinbach (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin Luther church in Soltau (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burgmauer in Kaisersesch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:54, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruisseau des Palanges (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:56, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Alpuech 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:56, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sts Cyr and Julitta church in Cassuejouls 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:56, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:35, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte Saint-Vital in Sauveterre-de-R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:35, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:45, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Soltau (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Steinbach (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:59, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhine in Mannheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:05, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:47, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former prison in Kaisersesch (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 05:08, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Herzberg (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Trees are obstructing the main subject (the building). --4084470 0.smil 02:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:20, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Steinbach (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin Luther church in Soltau (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L4 1 Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L4 16 Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhine in Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of the Jesuit's College in Rodez (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:00, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramparts of La Couvertoirade 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:00, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Perse in Espalion 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:00, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 Rue de l'Embergue in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Красный 15:41, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior wall lantern in the Castle of Onet-le-Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:42, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Perse in Espalion 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 15:52, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Steinbach (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin Luther church in Soltau (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L4 1 Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L4 16 Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:26, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhine in Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of the Jesuit's College in Rodez (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:00, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramparts of La Couvertoirade 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:00, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Perse in Espalion 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:00, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Graffiti in Millau (1).jpg

File:Graffiti in Millau (1).jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Graffiti in Millau (1).jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Anthimus and Saturninus church in Brommat 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:43, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascade des Palanges (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:37, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Bretzenheim in Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:10, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L8 12 in Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:10, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L10 1 in Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:13, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:13, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestant church in Steinbach (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:42, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L10 1 in Mannheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:24, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L7 6 in Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:42, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhine in Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:44, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Schule in Sigmaringen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:41, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City hall of Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:45, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich-List-Schule in Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:45, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palais Cunzmann in Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:45, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M5 1 in Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 10:54, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhein-Galerie in Ludwigshafen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:45, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulevard Gambetta in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:23, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 18 April 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2024 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhofstrasse 3 in Sigmaringen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwabstrasse 8 in Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwabstrasse 1 in Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alte Schule in Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waaghaus in Ravensburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:42, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rodez 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:46, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 8 Rue du Couvent in Sauveterre-de-R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 13:03, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 19 Rue de l'Embergue in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:46, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hoftheater in Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuerst-Wilhelm-Strasse 19 in Sigmaringen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchberg 2 in Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danube in Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascade de Saunhac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:55, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Christopher church in Sauveterre-de-R (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:46, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos male in Aveyron 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:46, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Post office in Rodez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhofstrasse 3 in Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:24, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Castor church in Karden (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:24, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Servatius church in Landkern (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:24, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancratius church in Kaisersesch (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:24, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:40, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Rue de l'Embergue in Rodez (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of town of Belcastel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Vezins-de-Levezou 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Place de la Cite in Rodez (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:05, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin Luther church in Soltau (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Clocks are blown out. --Екатерина Борисова 00:59, 31 March 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Servatius church in Landkern (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:10, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poststrasse 11 in Soltau (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:40, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old town hall of Soltau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:40, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 place de la Cite in Rodez (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:38, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15 Place de la Cite in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:37, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20 Place de la Cite in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photograph --Plasmium 00:56, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancratius church in Kaisersesch (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 Place de la Cite in Rodez (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhofstrasse 57 in Mindelheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (12 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Orlhaguet (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 14:06, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! World War I memorial in Mur-de-Barrez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vilya Shoni 09:44, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 50 Rue de l'Embergue in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --BlueRockThrush 13:26, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Matthew church in Ulmen (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Красный 05:22, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Alpuech 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 18:10, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Matthew church in Ulmen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:12, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poststrasse 11 in Soltau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:21, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maximilianstrasse 7 in Mindelheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit dark as most of your photos, but ok. --Plozessor 04:27, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maximilianstrasse 27 in Mindelheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de la Scipione in La Couvertoirade (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 18:32, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont du Parayre 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 18:55, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10 Boulevard Sadi Carnot in Millau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 18:32, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Servatius church in Landkern (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:11, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poststrasse 11 in Soltau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:01, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Sigmaringen (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --E bailey 02:36, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of La Cavalerie 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 16:11, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maximilianstrasse 35 in Mindelheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maximilianstrasse 39 in Mindelheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Altheim (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:23, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Lacroix-Barrez (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I would crop out some ground at the bottom --Benjism89 09:20, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Roch church in Montezic (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 09:20, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Stephen ans Blaise church in Le Monastere 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:27, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maximilianstrasse 7 in Mindelheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:34, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maximilianstrasse 35 in Mindelheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --TreFontane 07:42, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Mindelheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marstall in Sigmaringen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality but on the dark side.--Famberhorst 04:37, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Sigmaringen (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:20, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Plasmium 23:37, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2 Carrefour Saint-Etienne in Rodez 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Plasmium 23:37, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maximilianstrasse 36 in Mindelheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:06, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Sigmaringen (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:06, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Altheim (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:30, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marstall in Sigmaringen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Sigmaringen (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:30, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Giessen (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John church in Giessen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:04, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 place de la Cite in Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:46, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7 place de la Cite in Rodez (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:46, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bousquet Castle in Montpeyroux 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:53, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Altheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:31, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Flavin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 18:50, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Altheim (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Charles I Louis in Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:49, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Charles Frederick in Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:49, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:49, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Post office in Rodez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ROCKY 06:18, 15 April 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Baidax 14:21, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilgrims' shelter in Peyrusse-le-Roc (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:19, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel de Grailhe in La Couvertoirade 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:19, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 4 Place de la Cite in Rodez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plasmium 01:43, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 19 Rue de l'Embergue in Rodez (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Altheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebfrauenkirche in Ravensburg (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:02, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haldenstrasse 3 in Riedlingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:27, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 16 place Charles de Gaulle in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:04, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Christopher church in Peyre (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:38, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Present church in Peyrusse-le-Roc 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Sigmaringen (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 09:12, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.

Round 2 will end at 2 May 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Altheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:20, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Sigmaringen (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:32, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buergerhospitalkirche in Mannheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:13, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill of the Redounel in La Couvertoirade (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:36, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos male in Aveyron 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:24, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Radegund church in Ste-Radegonde (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice composition --Plasmium 15:01, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Sigmaringen (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:10, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donaustrasse 19 in Riedlingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:24, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

WLM-app takes a walk on the wild side!

Hello Tournasol7.

You can now use the WLM app not only to upload your photos for Wiki Loves Monuments, but also to take part in Wiki Loves Earth - Sweden!

From May 1 to May 30, you’ll have the chance to share photos of Sweden’s natural areas and join the contest directly from the app.

--Ysogo (talk) 20:10, 20 April 2026 (UTC) (This message was sent via Global message delivery system)

(This message was sent to User:Tournasol7 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:English-language information boa… This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Information board in Mount Ngongotaha SR (1).jpg

And also:

• File:Information board in Mount Ngongotaha SR (2).jpg
• File:Information board in Mount Ngongotaha SR (3).jpg
• File:Information board in Mount Ngongotaha SR (4).jpg
• File:Information board in Rainbow Mountain SR.jpg
• File:Wai-O-Tapu Thermal Wonderland.jpg

Yours sincerely, Traumnovelle (talk) 03:19, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Sigmaringen (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:09, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John parish church in Sigmaringen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:18, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortified Church of Inieres (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Amusing --JackyM59 11:45, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Radegund church in Ste-Radegonde (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 14:44, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John church in Giessen (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:32, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leib'sches Haus in Giessen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:32, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Servatius church in Landkern (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:35, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lederhaus in Ravensburg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haldenstrasse 3 in Riedlingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:58, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Giessen (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --I.Mahesh 02:50, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John church in Giessen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:38, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:23, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 09:35, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plasmium 20:19, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemalter Turm in Ravensburg (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:30, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Michael cloister & Mehlsack in Ravensburg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:16, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolmen de Vezinies III 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 18:44, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Giessen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 01:01, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint John church in Giessen (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steven Sun 01:53, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesuit church in Mannheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 01:01, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Saint-Agnan (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:39, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange Strasse 2 in Riedlingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:33, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 18 in Riedlingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:47, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Charles I Louis in Mannheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:39, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:15, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Forgerons in Sauveterre-de-R 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:02, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cascade de Saunhac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:02, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jesuit church in Mannheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:40, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schlosskirche in Mannheim (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:24, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:40, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morgan vehicles in Aveyron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Vezins-de-Levezou (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:50, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktplatz 16 in Riedlingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:02, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 15:08, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 22 Place de la Cite in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strange spot on the left. Fixable? --Юрий Д.К. 19:22, 16 April 2026 (UTC) Thanks, good job, I missed it. I asked the photograph ;) --Sebring12Hrs 15:06, 18 April 2026 (UTC)  New version uploaded. --Tournasol7 21:47, 21 April 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --ArildV 17:10, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St George church in Riedlingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwiefalter Strasse 2 in Riedlingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:41, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Aachen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:27, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rodez 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:08, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Onet-le-Chateau (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:08, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House of the Annunciation in Rodez (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:44, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Riedlingen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:46, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

FPC

Hi, Please check your votes. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:02, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

PS: Could you please archive your talk page? Yann (talk) 13:03, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Radegund church in Ste-Radegonde (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:07, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Boussac (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Barriou in Najac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caravane du Tour de France 2019 in Rodez 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:09, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:31, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Giessen (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:09, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lange Strasse 19 in Riedlingen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 05:41, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Bad Saulgau (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:29, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Giessen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:42, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:42, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutherkirche in Ludwigshafen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:42, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Louis church in Ludwigshafen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:42, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Our Lady of Rodez 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 02:42, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Amans Church in Rodez (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 02:08, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Naucelle 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 02:42, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:55, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krahnstrasse 4 in Osnabrueck (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krahnstrasse 7 in Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtwaage in Osnabrueck (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:43, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwiefalter Strasse 2 in Riedlingen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwiefalter Tor in Riedlingen (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Giessen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Saint-Vital in Sauveterre-de-R. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:51, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of Notre-Dame-de-Vanc 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:51, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in Flavin 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:25, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paradiesstrasse 5 in Bad Saulgau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:11, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 10:43, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:45, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Saint-Martin-de-Cormieres 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:45, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter Markt 3 in Bielefeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:26, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ratsgymnasium in Bielefeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lorax 22:51, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison de Benoit in Rodez (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plasmium 07:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Naucelle 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stadtgliederung 12:58, 29 April 2026 (UTC)  Support Voting in place of ineligible user (above) - Good quality --Jakubhal 18:50, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mill on the old bridge in Millau 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:46, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Gramond 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 09:30, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Martin church in Altheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly dark even for november I think. --ArildV 08:16, 19 April 2026 (UTC)  New version uploaded. --Tournasol7 21:48, 25 April 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 15:50, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 6 Boulevard Gambetta in Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place des Arcades in Sauveterre-de-R 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortified Church of Inieres (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:26, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:49, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bismarckstrasse 39 in Ludwigshafen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:49, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lutherkirche in Ludwigshafen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:49, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Louis church in Ludwigshafen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:49, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sparrenburg in Bielefeld (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:49, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Gramond 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:26, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church in La Mouline 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:26, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte des Anglais in Naucelle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:29, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss Mannheim (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:32, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Thomas church in Mur-de-Barrez 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Aachen (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:36, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Bielefeld (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:37, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bousquet Castle in Montpeyroux 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:13, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renaissance house in Mur-de-Barrez 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:29, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Saint-Beauzely 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 04:29, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bierstrasse 24 in Osnabrueck (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 11:34, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Domsfreiheit 24 in Osnabrueck (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 11:34, 2 May 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:23, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krahnstrasse 4 in Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 11:34, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 11:34, 2 May 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:23, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtwaage in Osnabrueck (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 11:08, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruisseau des Palanges (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plasmium 01:33, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Plage d'Antigues (17).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plage d'Antigues (17).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:24, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cathedral of Reims (17).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cathedral of Reims (17).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathedral of Aachen (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Bielefeld (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Bielefeld (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:24, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episcopal chancellery in Osnabrueck (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:06, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bierstrasse 24 in Osnabrueck (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:31, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Domsfreiheit 24 in Osnabrueck (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:39, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Osnabrueck (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:39, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 13:55, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ratsgymnasium in Bielefeld (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:16, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sparrenburg in Bielefeld (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:16, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Osnabrueck (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:03, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:16, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtwaage in Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:16, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15th-century house in Brommat 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 05:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City walls of La Cavalerie 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 05:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Villecomtal 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 05:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ratsgymnasium in Bielefeld (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:07, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bousquet Castle in Montpeyroux 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:34, 5 May 2026 (UTC)  Support Great photo and composition. --ArildV 13:53, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour de Monaco in Mur-de-Barrez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:26, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Priory of Saint-Jean-de-Balmes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 05:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Bielefeld (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:55, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sparrenburg in Bielefeld (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:28, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Osnabrueck (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:38, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter church in Curieres 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:19, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dourdou river in Villecomtal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:19, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Our Lady church in Salgues 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 11:39, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bierstrasse 24 in Osnabrueck (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 10:57, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleine Domsfreiheit 24 in Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 10:57, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Osnabrueck (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 10:57, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 10:57, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 10:57, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!

Hi everyone,

Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.

Here are your top three winning images:

• 

  

  First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area.
  Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
• 

  

  Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia.
  Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
• 

  

  Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers.
  Attribution: public domain

You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results

I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.

Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!

Regards,
ZI Jony
For the POTY Committee 20:03, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sparrenburg in Bielefeld (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:59, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Welle 50 in Bielefeld (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:49, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episcopal chancellery in Osnabrueck (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:43, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Osnabrueck (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:35, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:43, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Paul church in Salles-la-Source 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:10, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bousquet Castle in Montpeyroux 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:05, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renaissance house in Mur-de-Barrez 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:30, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theater am Alten Markt in Bielefeld (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:49, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunella grandiflora in Aveyron 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 10:41, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episcopal chancellery in Osnabrueck (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:27, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bierstrasse 24 in Osnabrueck (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:27, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Mary church in Osnabrueck (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:26, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (12 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain in Cayssac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plasmium 22:44, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Leuven (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:44, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forêt des Palanges (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 15:20, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thymus serpyllum in Aveyron (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 15:20, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l’Anse Lavolvaine (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:59, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de la Pointe Plate (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:27, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trace du Grand Cul-de-Sac Marin (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ND-du-Bon-Secours in Port-Louis (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:59, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Leuven (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Leuven (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 16:05, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Leuven (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 17:10, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krahnstrasse 7 in Osnabrueck (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Julian Herzog 11:00, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Osnabrueck (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Julian Herzog 10:54, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theater in Osnabrueck (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Julian Herzog 10:55, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de la Pointe Plate (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 14:15, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de Clugny (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:45, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de la Pointe Plate (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:45, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage d'Antigues (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:52, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Leuven (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:56, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Leuven (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:56, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Leuven (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:56, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage d'Antigues (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:22, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse du Vieux Fort (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:47, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de Clugny (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:47, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage Allegre (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:47, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse du Petit Fort (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:47, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de la Pointe Plate (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:47, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Leuven (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:01, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Leuven (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 18:30, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Leuven (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:10, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse des Iles (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 08:25, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse du Vieux Fort (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:50, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle of Saint-Beauzely 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:15, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de Clugny (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:01, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse des Iles (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:01, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage Allegre (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:07, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l’Anse Lavolvaine (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:13, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de la Pointe Plate (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 03:17, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Leuven (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:04, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter cathedral in Osnabrueck (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 16:52, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Welle 50 in Bielefeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse du Petit Fort (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:02, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tabebuia heterophylla near Plage de l'Anse du Petit Fort (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 01:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terminalia catappa at Plage de l'Anse de Nogent (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 01:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse de Nogent (47).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 01:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de Tillet (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pangalau 01:41, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Leuven (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 15:13, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter collegiate church in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 16:32, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tabebuia heterophylla near Plage de l'Anse du Petit Fort (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tabebuia heterophylla near Plage de l'Anse du Petit Fort (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage d'Antigues (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l’Anse Lavolvaine (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:52, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de Clugny (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:52, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter collegiate church in Leuven (50).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 12:08, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Martyrdom of Saint Dorothea by Josse van der Baren St Peter collegiate church in Leuven (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:30, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Cakovec (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:30, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:View of the fortified city of Carcassonne (2).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of the fortified city of Carcassonne (2).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:10, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage Allegre (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:46, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de la Pointe Plate (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:46, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Cakovec (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:58, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Cakovec (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:23, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Cakovec (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:23, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terminalia catappa near Pointe d'Antigue (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (I'm glad Guadeloupe is finally getting some QIs thanks to you ! :) ) --Benjism89 09:24, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse de Nogent (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de Tillet (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:39, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage Allegre (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse du Petit Fort (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:50, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de la Pointe Plate (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:39, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Cakovec (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:36, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Cakovec (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:15, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse du Vieux Fort (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:21, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de Clugny (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:20, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l’Anse Lavolvaine (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:20, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Cakovec (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:01, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:42, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:42, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markt 25 in Osnabrueck (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:47, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage Allegre (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:55, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse du Petit Fort (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:22, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de la Pointe Plate (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:55, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse du Vieux Fort (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:22, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ND-du-Bon-Secours in Port-Louis (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:20, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:02, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FalantoTaras 13:36, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 07:49, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse de Nogent (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:33, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de Tillet (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 17:35, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse du Vieux Fort (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:30, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage Allegre (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:30, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plage de l'Anse du Petit Fort (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:54, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:31, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:30, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 06:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Would be better with higher exposure, but OK --Benjism89 06:30, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Petit-Canal (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:33, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hiking sign in Petit-Canal (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:27, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Town hall of Port-Louis Guadeloupe (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:27, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:51, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:49, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 07:07, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zrinski Castle in Cakovec (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 07:50, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Martiel 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 07:07, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 May 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted/layout Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 May 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 May 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 May 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (31 May 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:32, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:27, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:46, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (12 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:45, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:49, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:45, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:04, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:06, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:42, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 June 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:38, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 July 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:48, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 July 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 July 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 July 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:33, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /Wilfredor ([[User talk:Wilfredor|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:44, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 July 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 July 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:39, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 July 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:36, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 July 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 July 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 July 2026)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:37, 10 July 2026 (UTC)